Targeting the Attention Heads Behind Object Hallucination in LLaVA

Vision-language models such as LLaVA-1.5-7B often hallucinate objects absent from the image when generating captions. We ask whether an interpretability diagnosis of this failure can guide a targeted fix, and we measure what that fix actually changes. We rank attention heads by how much their image attention drops around hallucinated object words, then screen the shortlist by ablating candidate heads and measuring the change in hallucination-token log probability, yielding a 32-head set. We restrict two interventions to these heads: a head-sliced LoRA adapter and an inference-time grounding controller. On 400 held-out COCO images, the combined method lowers CHAIRs (the fraction of captions with a hallucinated object) from $0.370$ to $0.230$ and CHAIRi (the fraction of hallucinated object mentions) from $0.156$ to $0.096$ ($p < 0.001$, paired sign-flip tests). Two controls sharpen attribution. A random-head LoRA control, matched layer-for-layer and trained identically, performs no better than the matched baseline on a separate 200-image control split, supporting the role of head selection rather than LoRA capacity. Under fixed decoding budgets, the CHAIR reduction persists and grows with budget ($23\%$ at 64 tokens to $58\%$ at 128), arguing against a pure max-token or truncation artifact, although the method remains shorter and more conservative. The resulting behavior reduces unsupported object mentions while also lowering object recall ($0.78$ to $0.70$). We present a diagnosis-to-intervention pipeline for object hallucination, and, more importantly, a controlled account of what acting on the diagnostic signal actually does: it localizes intervention sites with real, non-random leverage, reported as a behavioral profile rather than a single score.